Feature Specs vs. Functional Specs
I’ve come across projects where specs that can run self-contained don’t exist. They require the environment to be setup (like third-party APIs), and make development more difficult for new maintainers. These are Functional Specs, and they are meant to test out the application in a final state of polish (at least in my experience).
However, functional specs are not nearly as useful as Feature Specs. To be able to be able to run specs against a perfectly recreated environment is where feature specs shine. Yes, they are more complex to write than functional specs, but their value is in being able to run them exactly how you want. Whether it be with a specially crafted database record or a third-party API.
Feature specs allow you handle concerns like:
- How should the application work in the browser?
- What should happen when a third-party API is having issues?
- What should the user see when there are problems?
Sure, there are many more areas that can be covered, but basically, being able to mock third-party API interactions and create database records to meet your needs, is invaluable.
If you can write a functional spec for it, you can write a feature spec for it. Yes, it takes more effort, but future maintainers (including yourself) will be thankful you did.